Are Contingent Choices Consistent?
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Encouraging Consistent Translation Choices
It has long been observed that monolingual text exhibits a tendency toward “one sense per discourse,” and it has been argued that a related “one translation per discourse” constraint is operative in bilingual contexts as well. In this paper, we introduce a novel method using forced decoding to confirm the validity of this constraint, and we demonstrate that it can be exploited in order to impro...
متن کاملBehavioral Anomalies in Contingent Values and Actual Choices
A growing body of literature demonstrates that many behavioral anomalies observed in stated-preference elicitation methods such as the contingent valuation method are also observed in actual choices and vice versa. This presentation furthers the argument that such parallel behaviors should be viewed as a strength of stated-preference methods. Three well-known anomalies observed in both stated p...
متن کاملAre addictions diseases or choices?
Are addictions diseases? Certainly they are included in recent and forthcoming versions of the DSM and other widely used diagnostic schemas. Still, the concept does not have universal support. Particularly widespread is the suspicion that drug use is a choice, even for individuals with long-time substance dependence. The idea cannot be completely dismissed. Most people who meet criteria for an ...
متن کاملGoal Management in Sequential Choices: Consumer Choices for Others Are More Indulgent than Personal Choices
What are the differences in exerting self-control in sequential choices when consumers choose for others (family or friends) rather than for themselves? Sequential choices represent an opportunity to manage the pursuit of one’s multiple personal goals. Consumers typically manage these personal goals by combining indulgent and virtuous choices. When choosing for others, however, this is not the ...
متن کاملAre Hard Choices Cases of Incomparability
This paper presents an argument against the widespread view that ‘hard choices’ are hard because of the incomparability of the alternatives. The argument has two parts. First, I argue that any plausible theory of practical reason must be ‘comparativist’ in form, that is, it must hold that a comparative relation between the alternatives with respect to what matters in the choice determines a jus...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: SSRN Electronic Journal
سال: 2015
ISSN: 1556-5068
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2667452